[Talossa.com portal]
[Citizens Toolbox]
[Immigration]
No Running elections

Parent message
President AnglatzarâNovember 01, 2005 - 11:23
RE: If I only Had A Seat . . . . :)(#23273), posted by D. N. Vercáriâ, [IP Hidden], November 01, 2005 - 13:52. Viewed 102 times.
User InfoText
D. N. Vercáriâ
Group: citizens
(4498 posts total)
(last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercáriâ
> > > Kill a deputy and force a by-election!
> >
> > But don't forget to read the Eletoral Act first to see what it says in regard of by-elections, just to make sure that you're not recommending to commit a senseless crime, Herr Minister.
>
> As long as I'm not a Deputy myself, why should I ca... Ah, NOW I see. Of course, my special task in this government is to make sure the population grows, not shrinks. Right. Thanks, Deet, for keeping me in check!

I wanted to avoid the following embarrassing situation:

Attorney-General: "Citizen, why did you try to commit this terrible crime, why did you pull the trigger of your gun?"
The Citizen: "Because I was told to do so, and because I wanted to trigger by-elections."
The Deputies: "LOL! Yet we didn't even vote on introducing something like by-elections, so trigger right away."


- D. N. Vercáriâ

¡Pecüliárismeu és escasençâ - MRP!
RE: If I only Had A Seat . . . . :)D. N. VercáriâNovember 01, 2005 - 13:52
la garçâ malpadertNovember 01, 2005 - 15:42

Parent message
D. N. VercáriâNovember 01, 2005 - 13:52
There already is provision for by-elections.(#23277), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], November 01, 2005 - 15:42. Viewed 125 times.
User InfoText
la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercáriâ
> > > > Kill a deputy and force a by-election!
> > >
> > > But don't forget to read the Eletoral Act first to see what it says in regard of by-elections, just to make sure that you're not recommending to commit a senseless crime, Herr Minister.
> >
> > As long as I'm not a Deputy myself, why should I ca... Ah, NOW I see. Of course, my special task in this government is to make sure the population grows, not shrinks. Right. Thanks, Deet, for keeping me in check!
>
> I wanted to avoid the following embarrassing situation:
>
> Attorney-General: "Citizen, why did you try to commit this terrible crime, why did you pull the trigger of your gun?"
> The Citizen: "Because I was told to do so, and because I wanted to trigger by-elections."
> The Deputies: "LOL! Yet we didn't even vote on introducing something like by-elections, so trigger right away."

Er, we do have provision for by-elections.

Constitution of the Republic, Title Two, Article One, Section 9(b) and (c):

The following powers may be exercised by the President at his own discretion:
[...]
b) The President shall dissolve either or both Houses of Parlamînt at the times specified in Article 4 and then immediately ask the Secretary of State to conduct a general election.
c) The President may dissolve both Houses of Parlamînt at any other time, and then immediately ask the Secretary of State to conduct a by-election.


Electoral Code, Section 4.1

All provisions of this Section shall apply equally to elections to fill vacancies in the Chamber of Deputies and in the Senäts[...]

Translated out of legalese:

- The President can call a byelection whenever he wants, but only for all seats in the House - like a special general election in other words.
- Such elections are conducted by the same rules as regular elections.
Miestrâ Schivâ
Seneschál dal Repúblicâ Talossán / Prime Minister of the Republic of Talossa
"The Republic's Most Articulate Spokeswhatever" - R. B. Madison
D. N. VercáriâNovember 02, 2005 - 03:58

Parent message
la garçâ malpadertNovember 01, 2005 - 15:42
RE: There already is provision for by-elections.(#23284), posted by D. N. Vercáriâ, [IP Hidden], November 02, 2005 - 03:58. Viewed 112 times.
User InfoText
D. N. Vercáriâ
Group: citizens
(4498 posts total)
(last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercáriâ
> Er, we do have provision for by-elections.
>
> Constitution of the Republic, Title Two, Article One, Section 9(b) and (c):
>
> The following powers may be exercised by the President at his own discretion:
> [...]
> b) The President shall dissolve either or both Houses of Parlamînt at the times specified in Article 4 and then immediately ask the Secretary of State to conduct a general election.
> c) The President may dissolve both Houses of Parlamînt at any other time, and then immediately ask the Secretary of State to conduct a by-election.


I wonder if this restricts us (CoD members) in our quest for rules that may allow us to deal with vacant seats, which was the kind of by-elections that I was talking about.

> Electoral Code, Section 4.1
>
> All provisions of this Section shall apply equally to elections to fill vacancies in the Chamber of Deputies and in the Senäts[...]
>
> Translated out of legalese:
>
> - The President can call a byelection whenever he wants, but only for all seats in the House - like a special general election in other words.
> - Such elections are conducted by the same rules as regular elections.

We possibly should -carefully- inspect the by-election rule (and related sections of the constitution) for a possible amendment in the amendment committee. I wonder if it really make sense to conduct "by-elections" if a chamber of parliament is dissolved by the President; full-scale general elections might be a better solution, but that would mean that we give up on the fixed annual elections calendar.

- D. N. Vercáriâ

¡Pecüliárismeu és escasençâ - MRP!
la garçâ malpadertNovember 02, 2005 - 13:48

Parent message
D. N. VercáriâNovember 02, 2005 - 03:58
RE: There already is provision for by-elections.(#23309), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], November 02, 2005 - 13:48. Viewed 113 times.
User InfoText
la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercáriâ

> I wonder if this restricts us (CoD members) in our quest for rules that may allow us to deal with vacant seats, which was the kind of by-elections that I was talking about.

Yes, which is why I've gone forward with my "nomination and referendum plan" in the Chamber.

> I wonder if it really make sense to conduct "by-elections" if a chamber of parliament is dissolved by the President; full-scale general elections might be a better solution, but that would mean that we give up on the fixed annual elections calendar.

Well, that's exactly the thing. When the Constitution was being drafted M-P wanted the fixed elections calendar to be non-negotiable, but to leave provision for "by-elections" in between times. Certainly we can discuss this matter in the committee.



Miestrâ Schivâ
Seneschál dal Repúblicâ Talossán / Prime Minister of the Republic of Talossa
"The Republic's Most Articulate Spokeswhatever" - R. B. Madison
Üc TärfâNovember 03, 2005 - 10:26

Parent message
la garçâ malpadertNovember 02, 2005 - 13:48
Wait a minute!(#23344), posted by Üc Tärfâ, [IP Hidden], November 03, 2005 - 10:26. Viewed 113 times.
User InfoText
Üc Tärfâ
Group: citizens
(1365 posts total)
(last post: March 10, 2008 - 08:29)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercáriâ
>
> > I wonder if this restricts us (CoD members) in our quest for rules that may allow us to deal with vacant seats, which was the kind of by-elections that I was talking about.
>
> Yes, which is why I've gone forward with my "nomination and referendum plan" in the Chamber.
>
> > I wonder if it really make sense to conduct "by-elections" if a chamber of parliament is dissolved by the President; full-scale general elections might be a better solution, but that would mean that we give up on the fixed annual elections calendar.
>
> Well, that's exactly the thing. When the Constitution was being drafted M-P wanted the fixed elections calendar to be non-negotiable, but to leave provision for "by-elections" in between times. Certainly we can discuss this matter in the committee.

Wait a minute! Does it mean that if the President dissolve the Parlamînt earlier, the newly electiected parlamînt doesn't live 6 months but it's dissolved in may and in september as well??

I think this is a system neither fair nor democratic... The newly elected parlamînt may be seen as a "provisional" parlamînt where not important issues are approved because it has the function to led the country towards the "regular" parlamînt. This system introduce a dangerous classification in Premier-Parlamînt and Secondary-Parlamînt. We should provide that EVERY Parlamînt if is not dissolved earlier, has to live 6 months, even if it's mean that the general election are in november or in april...
____________________________
MRP Spokesman / Dûceu dels mocts dal MRP
my talossán personal page.
Visitetz Cézembre dürånt el otogñheu.

e-mail: ugo.truffelli AT libero.it
Mr. Furxheir, R.M.W.November 03, 2005 - 13:39

Parent message
Üc TärfâNovember 03, 2005 - 10:26
The idea...(#23354), posted by Mr. Furxheir, R.M.W., [IP Hidden], November 03, 2005 - 13:39. Viewed 117 times.
User InfoText
Mr. Furxheir, R.M.W.
Group: admins
(1791 posts total)
(last post: November 24, 2007 - 15:07)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercáriâ
> >
> > > I wonder if this restricts us (CoD members) in our quest for rules that may allow us to deal with vacant seats, which was the kind of by-elections that I was talking about.
> >
> > Yes, which is why I've gone forward with my "nomination and referendum plan" in the Chamber.
> >
> > > I wonder if it really make sense to conduct "by-elections" if a chamber of parliament is dissolved by the President; full-scale general elections might be a better solution, but that would mean that we give up on the fixed annual elections calendar.
> >
> > Well, that's exactly the thing. When the Constitution was being drafted M-P wanted the fixed elections calendar to be non-negotiable, but to leave provision for "by-elections" in between times. Certainly we can discuss this matter in the committee.
>
> Wait a minute! Does it mean that if the President dissolve the Parlamînt earlier, the newly electiected parlamînt doesn't live 6 months but it's dissolved in may and in september as well??
>
> I think this is a system neither fair nor democratic...

The reason for that is simple, it is to increase voter's participation by giving a FIXED date for elections.




War doesn't determine who's right. War determines who's left

Deputy, Foreign affairs minister and Deputy Prime-Minister
Database and Wittenberg Administrator,
Resident Miracle Worker
e-mail me at : webmaster[at]talossa.net

Üc TärfâNovember 03, 2005 - 15:14

Parent message
Mr. Furxheir, R.M.W.November 03, 2005 - 13:39
RE: The idea...(#23358), posted by Üc Tärfâ, [IP Hidden], November 03, 2005 - 15:14. Viewed 94 times.
User InfoText
Üc Tärfâ
Group: citizens
(1365 posts total)
(last post: March 10, 2008 - 08:29)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercáriâ
> The reason for that is simple, it is to increase voter's participation by giving a FIXED date for elections.

If a Parlamînt is supposed to lives 6 months, the date for elections is then fixed 5 and an half months before the election starts. Sufficient fixed.
____________________________
MRP Spokesman / Dûceu dels mocts dal MRP
my talossán personal page.
Visitetz Cézembre dürånt el otogñheu.

e-mail: ugo.truffelli AT libero.it
Reply to this post | Back to the forum | Forums Overview| Deactivate Thread View
Forums Overview | Login | Register | Lost your password? Cyphor (Release: 0.19, PHP 5.2.5)