[Citizens Toolbox] [Immigration] |
| No Running elections |
Parent message | ||||
| la garçâ malpadert | November 02, 2005 - 13:48 | |||
| Wait a minute!(#23344), posted by Üc Tärfâ, [IP Hidden], November 03, 2005 - 10:26. Viewed 106 times. |
| User Info | Text |
| Üc Tärfā Group: citizens (1365 posts total) (last post: March 10, 2008 - 08:29) Citizen #28: Ugo Truffelli | > > > I wonder if this restricts us (CoD members) in our quest for rules that may allow us to deal with vacant seats, which was the kind of by-elections that I was talking about. > > Yes, which is why I've gone forward with my "nomination and referendum plan" in the Chamber. > > > I wonder if it really make sense to conduct "by-elections" if a chamber of parliament is dissolved by the President; full-scale general elections might be a better solution, but that would mean that we give up on the fixed annual elections calendar. > > Well, that's exactly the thing. When the Constitution was being drafted M-P wanted the fixed elections calendar to be non-negotiable, but to leave provision for "by-elections" in between times. Certainly we can discuss this matter in the committee. Wait a minute! Does it mean that if the President dissolve the Parlamīnt earlier, the newly electiected parlamīnt doesn't live 6 months but it's dissolved in may and in september as well?? I think this is a system neither fair nor democratic... The newly elected parlamīnt may be seen as a "provisional" parlamīnt where not important issues are approved because it has the function to led the country towards the "regular" parlamīnt. This system introduce a dangerous classification in Premier-Parlamīnt and Secondary-Parlamīnt. We should provide that EVERY Parlamīnt if is not dissolved earlier, has to live 6 months, even if it's mean that the general election are in november or in april... ____________________________ MRP Spokesman / Dūceu dels mocts dal MRP my talossįn personal page. Visitetz Cézembre dürånt el otogńheu.  e-mail: ugo.truffelli AT libero.it |
| ||||||||||||
|