[Citizens Toolbox] [Immigration] |
| No Running elections |
Parent message | ||||||
| Üc Tärfâ | November 03, 2005 - 10:26 | |||||
| The idea...(#23354), posted by Mr. Furxheir, R.M.W., [IP Hidden], November 03, 2005 - 13:39. Viewed 108 times. |
| User Info | Text | ||
| Mr. Furxheir, R.M.W. Group: admins (1791 posts total) (last post: November 24, 2007 - 15:07) Citizen #20: Martí- Paìr Furxhéir | > > > > > I wonder if this restricts us (CoD members) in our quest for rules that may allow us to deal with vacant seats, which was the kind of by-elections that I was talking about. > > > > Yes, which is why I've gone forward with my "nomination and referendum plan" in the Chamber. > > > > > I wonder if it really make sense to conduct "by-elections" if a chamber of parliament is dissolved by the President; full-scale general elections might be a better solution, but that would mean that we give up on the fixed annual elections calendar. > > > > Well, that's exactly the thing. When the Constitution was being drafted M-P wanted the fixed elections calendar to be non-negotiable, but to leave provision for "by-elections" in between times. Certainly we can discuss this matter in the committee. > > Wait a minute! Does it mean that if the President dissolve the Parlamînt earlier, the newly electiected parlamînt doesn't live 6 months but it's dissolved in may and in september as well?? > > I think this is a system neither fair nor democratic... The reason for that is simple, it is to increase voter's participation by giving a FIXED date for elections. War doesn't determine who's right. War determines who's left
|
| |||||||||
|
