[Talossa.com portal]
[Citizens Toolbox]
[Immigration]
No Running elections

Parent message
Túischac’h Txec EreufighleuNovember 03, 2005 - 16:49
RE: Absolutely(#23385), posted by D. N. Vercáriâ, [IP Hidden], November 04, 2005 - 03:06. Viewed 105 times.
User InfoText
D. N. Vercáriâ
Group: citizens
(4498 posts total)
(last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercáriâ
I all brevity, I think there are several layers that should be kept seperate.

a) It's not up to the state or any other institution to acknowledge or disallow private relationships between people, beyond a general framework. (If people like sort of a religious recognition of their relationship, fine, that's their own business; this should not be imposed on those who don't care for said religion, not by the state).

b) Where matrimony covers a bundle of civil contracts, so to speak, these civil contracts could be provided anyway, whenever people decide to choose so.

c) Special support for raising children may be granted as well, depending on whether there are children or not.

- D. N. Vercáriâ

¡Pecüliárismeu és escasençâ - MRP!
Reply to this post | Back to the forum | Forums Overview| Activate Thread View
Forums Overview | Login | Register | Lost your password? Cyphor (Release: 0.19, PHP 5.2.5)