D. N. Vercįriā
Group: citizens
(4498 posts total)
(last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercįriā | A longer reply was lost because the board logged me out while I was typing too slowly and under Windows my strategy to overcome this flaw didn't work.
Apparently I have to hurry up when typing now to avoid this annoying mishap for a second time. No time for looking up the dictionary to brush up my simplistic speech.
So briefly, if every member of the government could proclaim at any time that he or she wasn't speaking in the capacity of a member of the government when breaching the Schivā Law, what would it be good for then? IMHO it has never been our problem that any government as a whole wasted too much time with obsessing about possible modes and matters of a possible or impossible Talossan (re)unification.
The Schivā Doctrine, as a law, will not do us any good except providing one more tricky legal mantrap for future governments that their members will not always be aware of. So, it would be easy to make them stumble while it wouldn't keep them from ranting away in their perfect innocence, and that's why I still wholeheartedly recommend to vote NO in the referendum. The spirit of the doctrine itself is okay, but as a law it's not needed, and, even more so, not improving the public affairs of our Republic.
_________________
- Dieter
A long history is fine, a long future is better.
|
