|
| Judicial Infrastructure | Art Verbotten | December 13, 2006 - 15:38 | | President Anglatzarâ | December 14, 2006 - 05:32 |
| Parent message | | Judicial Infrastructure | Art Verbotten | December 13, 2006 - 15:38 |
| RE: Judicial Infrastructure(#116), posted by President Anglatzarâ, [IP Hidden], December 14, 2006 - 05:32. Viewed 935 times. |
|
President Anglatzarā Group: admins (3194 posts total) (last post: March 14, 2008 - 07:21) Citizen #19: Art Verbotten | I'd say provincial, definitely. The other option would be to have two sets of lower courts, a criminal court and an administrative court (where I hope the former one wouldn't have much to do except perhaps libel cases). The High Court could be the same for both these branches.
But I'd really prefer them to be provincial courts, to strengthen the provinces.
--
 |
|
| | D. N. Vercáriâ | December 14, 2006 - 12:22 |
| Parent message | | President Anglatzarâ | December 14, 2006 - 05:32 |
| RE: Judicial Infrastructure(#117), posted by D. N. Vercáriâ, [IP Hidden], December 14, 2006 - 12:22. Viewed 845 times. |
|
D. N. Vercįriā Group: citizens (4498 posts total) (last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51) Citizen #19: Art Verbotten | "Chris Anglatzarâ"? Our Chief Justice was talking to someone named Chris, wasn't he? :-)
__________________
- Dieter
|
|
| | President Anglatzarâ | December 14, 2006 - 14:12 |
| Parent message | | D. N. Vercáriâ | December 14, 2006 - 12:22 |
| RE: Judicial Infrastructure(#118), posted by President Anglatzarâ, [IP Hidden], December 14, 2006 - 14:12. Viewed 968 times. |
|
President Anglatzarā Group: admins (3194 posts total) (last post: March 14, 2008 - 07:21) Citizen #19: Art Verbotten | > "Chris Anglatzarâ"? Our Chief Justice was talking to someone named Chris, wasn't he? :-)
Bother, I was sloppy when I read that. I read "And if I might request, no one elses" as "And if I might request, anyone elses."
Sorry, Mr. Judge! Ignore what I wrote. If you re-post the message in a new thread, I can delete this one. (If we had had better forum s/w I could have moved or deleted just the responses...)
--
 |
|
| | Art Verbotten | December 15, 2006 - 00:08 |
| Parent message | | President Anglatzarâ | December 14, 2006 - 14:12 |
| RE: Judicial Infrastructure(#119), posted by Art Verbotten, [IP Hidden], December 15, 2006 - 00:08. Viewed 1013 times. |
|
Art Verbotten Group: citizens (850 posts total) (last post: March 14, 2008 - 13:16) Citizen #19: Art Verbotten | No problem, just shut up and go away already. :-)
Don't delete anything. Thanks for your input and this topic will be brought up again for larger discussion later, probably on a different board.
I figure that since Chris and myself have so much to do these days from a judicial standpoint, we can use this chamber as a "Judicial Think Tank" from time to time. I encourage others to view, but in order to keep the thread drift to a minimum, it should be just Chris and myself here.
The Honorable Art Verbotten
"Some mornings it's just not worth chewing through the leather restraints." --E P |
|
|
|