[Talossa.com portal]
[Citizens Toolbox]
[Immigration]
No Running elections

Parent message
D. N. VercáriâFebruary 02, 2005 - 14:12
RE: Question for the High Cort(#28), posted by Art Verbotten, [IP Hidden], February 12, 2005 - 00:32. Viewed 494 times.
User InfoText
Art Verbotten
Group: citizens
(850 posts total)
(last post: March 14, 2008 - 13:16)
Citizen #19:
Art Verbotten
Hello,

> Yes. But it's confusing me that Art III, Sec. 2 is intertwined with Sec. 1 which IMO is talking about measures that are to be taken immediately after the declaration of independence.

Than Article III Sec.2 needs to be listed when discussing this provision. Articles in a constitution need to be independent instructions that define a common theme. If they cannot stand on their own, they need to be looked at.

> Thus Sec. 2 seems to suggest something that *the first Dean ever* shall have to do immediately. No section of Article 3 mentions what is supposed to happen in case of regular Dean elections (Section 4 a just mentions the 6-months term of the Dean).

Then that definition needs to be spelled out specifically.
This is the law of the land we are talking about here.
If it doesn't clarify things, it isn't doing its job.


> I didn't mean to recommend legislating from the bench, but now I see that it sounded like this. I like the way how you clarified what we are supposed to do.


All we have are the words they have written.
That's our job my justice friend, that's our job. :-)





Justic Art V.

One puts on black robes to scare the hell out of white people, while the other puts on white robes to scare the hell out of blacks. --Morris K. Udall
Reply to this post | Back to the forum | Forums Overview| Activate Thread View
Forums Overview | Login | Register | Lost your password? Cyphor (Release: 0.19, PHP 5.2.5)