[Talossa.com portal]
[Citizens Toolbox]
[Immigration]
No Running elections
Question to the High Court: Article 1.3.6(#39), posted by Üc Tärfâ, [IP Hidden], July 21, 2005 - 07:08. Viewed 507 times.
User InfoText
Üc Tärfâ
Group: citizens
(1365 posts total)
(last post: March 10, 2008 - 08:29)
Citizen #28:
Ugo Truffelli
Drept Tgonoravál,

I'm looking for a decisiond of the High Court on the interpretation of Article 1.3.6 of the Constitution of the Republic, because it's only your right to interpetate the Constitution [§2.4.8(4)]

Here it's the Article:

6. New provinces may be formed by Parlamînt out of the territory of existing provinces, on the motion of :
(a) a petition of citizens either resident in or assigned to the territory concerned, and with;
(b) the consent of the legislature(s) (if these exist) of the province(s) affected.


Does the definition of new province implies also the change of the souveranity in a territoty between two existing provinces? IMHO this article deals only on the formation of new (6th, 7th, 8th, etc) Provinces.

Thanks.



my talossán personal page.
Visitetz Cézembre dürånt el etéu.

e-mail: ugo.truffelli AT libero.it
Question to the High Court: Article 1.3.6Üc TärfâJuly 21, 2005 - 07:08
Art VerbottenJuly 23, 2005 - 01:36
la garçâ malpadertJuly 21, 2005 - 18:37
Justice dal NavâJuly 21, 2005 - 10:42
Üc TärfâJuly 21, 2005 - 14:14
Üc TärfâJuly 21, 2005 - 14:26
Reply to this post | Back to the forum | Forums Overview| Activate Thread View
Forums Overview | Login | Register | Lost your password? Cyphor (Release: 0.19, PHP 5.2.5)