[Citizens Toolbox] [Immigration] |
| No Running elections |
Parent message | ||||
| Justice dal Navâ | July 21, 2005 - 10:42 | |||
| RE: Question to the High Court: Article 1.3.6(#41), posted by Üc Tärfâ, [IP Hidden], July 21, 2005 - 14:14. Viewed 453 times. |
| User Info | Text |
| Üc Tärfâ Group: citizens (1365 posts total) (last post: March 10, 2008 - 08:29) Citizen #28: Ugo Truffelli | > > Drept Tgonoravál, > > > > I'm looking for a decisiond of the High Court on the interpretation of Article 1.3.6 of the Constitution of the Republic, because it's only your right to interpetate the Constitution [§2.4.8(4)] > > > > Here it's the Article: > > > > 6. New provinces may be formed by Parlamînt out of the territory of existing provinces, on the motion of : > > (a) a petition of citizens either resident in or assigned to the territory concerned, and with; > > (b) the consent of the legislature(s) (if these exist) of the province(s) affected. > > > > Does the definition of new province implies also the change of the souveranity in a territoty between two existing provinces? IMHO this article deals only on the formation of new (6th, 7th, 8th, etc) Provinces. > > I can tell you, as an experienced Court member and a Talossan lawyer in times past, that you are wrong. "New province" means formations of new provinces, whether we add more or two merge into new ones. "New provinces" does NOT cover "transfer of sovereignty or sovereign land". Isn't it what i mean? that it doesn't cover "transfer of sovereignty or sovereign land"? Transfer Jonhatan's house from Maricopa to Cézembre it's a "transfer of sovereignty or sovereign land".  my talossán personal page. Visitetz Cézembre dürånt el etéu. e-mail: ugo.truffelli AT libero.it |
| |||||||||
|