[Talossa.com portal]
[Citizens Toolbox]
[Immigration]
No Running elections
Parent message
  • Verdict on RC9
    		• Art VerbottenAugust 19, 2005 - 00:51
    Question to the Court(#73), posted by Justice dal Navâ, [IP Hidden], August 19, 2005 - 06:27. Viewed 833 times.
    User InfoText
    Justice dal Navâ
    Group: admins
    (5222 posts total)
    (last post: March 14, 2008 - 13:43)
    Citizen #2:
    Chris Gruber    		> We have already made an exception to this rule with some of our founding fathers, allowing them to petition for their provincial assignments. I should think that some minor rearranging would be acceptable.

    While I am not arguing with the ruling (you already know my feelings), may I ask when and where did we make any exception to this rule? Everyone (save JKK, apparently) is assigned to the province the Provincial Assignments Code (Code II.5.1) requires, no exceptions.

    If no such exception is found and if the Honourable Justice based his decision on such perceived exceptions, then I would humbly request an appeal on this matter. If that perception did not have any real bearing on the Justice's decision, then the point would be moot and the judgment would naturally stand as is.

    I thank you for your time.


    ________________________
    Chirischtôval Curt Cavéir,
    President of the Republic of Talossa
    Minister of Information
    Minister of Defence
    Board of l'Icastolâ: Keeping el Glheþ safe, legal, and free since Twenty-Aught-Five

    caramidâ és eic'hán
    None of your business.
    Question to the CourtJustice dal NavâAugust 19, 2005 - 06:27
    Art VerbottenAugust 19, 2005 - 23:51
    Parent message
    Justice dal NavâAugust 19, 2005 - 06:27
    RE: Question to the Court(#75), posted by Art Verbotten, [IP Hidden], August 19, 2005 - 23:51. Viewed 851 times.
    User InfoText
    Art Verbotten
    Group: citizens
    (850 posts total)
    (last post: March 14, 2008 - 13:16)
    Citizen #2:
    Chris Gruber    		Mr. President,

    Thank you for your question.

    I did not base my decision on that last comment, only on the comments that I cited with the Constitution backing them. It does however give the decision more weight which is why I mentioned it.

    There is in fact an exception to the provincial assignments, and I believe that person is me.

    According to the new citizens code, Florencians are from Wisconsin, but from territories outside of the Republic.

    I live east of I-43, North of 94 (that should actually be 794), and south of Glendale so I am within the Republic's boundaries, but I am not not in Florencia province. I'm not even sure what province I am suppose to be in, but since I requested being in the one I founded on my own a decade or so ago, I assumed that folks conceded the point.

    I moved out of Florencia proper in Spring of 97.
    My provincial assignment was not changed because:
    1. I did so before the laws changed so I was grandfathered in.
    2. I requested not to be reassigned and used my clout to avoid the reassignment vote of the Cosa.
    3. I was told if I ever moved, the assignment would change.

    I'm not sure how this effects my current assignment, but that is the way it is folks.




    A.V.

    If Jesus was a carpenter I wonder how much he charged for bookshelves.--W. Allen
    Reply to this post | Back to the forum | Forums Overview| Deactivate Thread View
    Forums Overview | Login | Register | Lost your password? Cyphor (Release: 0.19, PHP 5.2.5)