|
| RE: Just out of curiousity... | Jay | March 18, 2007 - 22:28 | | la garçâ malpadert | March 18, 2007 - 22:38 |
|
Parent message | | Jay | March 18, 2007 - 22:28 |
| RE: Just out of curiousity...(#1174), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], March 18, 2007 - 22:38. Viewed 293 times. |
|
la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #35:
Jay Shorten | > I had been keeping track of who voted and whom I needed to send reminders to, so I do have how many people voted on what days. Would it be legal to release the information?
The Elections and Referendums Code, section 2.6, states:
All vote totals and count details, except those which might undermine the secrecy of the ballot, shall be published by the Secretary of State after the election is completed, to ensure the transparency of the system.
So, as long as you don't identify who voted when (because that might give something away), I don't see any problem.
Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Culture
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic
Ár Repúblicâ Tent 'N Fütür - Votetz ZRT!
|
|
| | Jay | March 18, 2007 - 23:00 |
|
Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | March 18, 2007 - 22:38 |
| RE: Just out of curiousity...(#1175), posted by Jay, [IP Hidden], March 18, 2007 - 23:00. Viewed 317 times. |
|
Jay
Group: citizens
(658 posts total)
(last post: December 26, 2007 - 08:24)
Citizen #35:
Jay Shorten | I didn’t keep track of who voted on what day: just the fact that they voted or not. So here are the totals:
March 4: 3
March 5: 9 (12)
March 6: 2 (14)
March 7: 1 (15)
March 8: 1 (16)
March 15: 1 (17)
March 16: 1 (18)
March 17: 3 (21)
|
|
| | Txec Danihél dal Már. | March 18, 2007 - 23:10 |
|
Parent message | | Jay | March 18, 2007 - 23:00 |
| RE: Just out of curiousity...(#1177), posted by Txec Danihél dal Már., [IP Hidden], March 18, 2007 - 23:10. Viewed 313 times. |
|
Txec Danihél dal Már.
Group: citizens
(555 posts total)
(last post: March 12, 2008 - 20:54)
Citizen #35:
Jay Shorten | These tallies are somewhat surprising to me. 9/21 votes came in after the initial bump the first two days. 4/21 votes came in on the final two days. Interesting results. Campaigning to the last minute is a good idea.
Txec dal Már
If you're going to leave a line, make a line!
|
|
| | Txec Danihél dal Már. | March 18, 2007 - 23:25 |
|
Parent message | | Txec Danihél dal Már. | March 18, 2007 - 23:10 |
| Correction(#1179), posted by Txec Danihél dal Már., [IP Hidden], March 18, 2007 - 23:25. Viewed 286 times. |
|
Txec Danihél dal Már.
Group: citizens
(555 posts total)
(last post: March 12, 2008 - 20:54)
Citizen #35:
Jay Shorten | > These tallies are somewhat surprising to me. 12/21 votes came in after the initial bump the first two days. 4/21 votes came in on the final two days. Interesting results. Campaigning to the last minute is a good idea.
>
Txec dal Már
If you're going to leave a line, make a line!
|
|
| | la garçâ malpadert | March 18, 2007 - 23:05 |
|
Parent message | | Jay | March 18, 2007 - 23:00 |
| RE: Just out of curiousity...(#1176), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], March 18, 2007 - 23:05. Viewed 313 times. |
|
la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #35:
Jay Shorten |
> March 4: 3
> March 5: 9 (12)
> March 6: 2 (14)
> March 7: 1 (15)
> March 8: 1 (16)
> March 15: 1 (17)
> March 16: 1 (18)
> March 17: 3 (21)
More than half the election was over in the first two days - unsurprising. But the amount of people who kept it to the last minute are a bit of a surprise. In fact, those final three voters might have swung the election. Bloody buggering hell. Maybe releasing the last paragraph of the manifesto on the last day of the election was a decisive problem after all.
I do note that there was an entire week with no-one voting. Is this an argument for cutting the voting period to one week?
Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Culture
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic
Ár Repúblicâ Tent 'N Fütür - Votetz ZRT!
|
|
| | D. N. Vercáriâ | March 19, 2007 - 04:38 |
|
Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | March 18, 2007 - 23:05 |
| RE: Cutting the voting period?(#1181), posted by D. N. Vercáriâ, [IP Hidden], March 19, 2007 - 04:38. Viewed 364 times. |
|
D. N. Vercáriâ
Group: citizens
(4498 posts total)
(last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51)
Citizen #35:
Jay Shorten |
> I do note that there was an entire week with no-one voting. Is this an argument for cutting the voting period to one week?
Neither, nor. Maybe we'd have to ask the electors, if they remember an election which they would have missed if the voting period was only one week.
But we'll have to take a look at the campaigning side, too. How many of the candidates would have been missing the "hot phase" of a campaign, if the voting period would be only one week?
I think it's easy to miss one week; two weeks may be a long time, but it suits our part-time Talossan life well.
__________________
- Dieter
|
|
| | Txec Danihél dal Már. | March 18, 2007 - 23:17 |
|
Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | March 18, 2007 - 23:05 |
| RE: Just out of curiousity...(#1178), posted by Txec Danihél dal Már., [IP Hidden], March 18, 2007 - 23:17. Viewed 325 times. |
|
Txec Danihél dal Már.
Group: citizens
(555 posts total)
(last post: March 12, 2008 - 20:54)
Citizen #35:
Jay Shorten |
>
> I do note that there was an entire week with no-one voting. Is this an argument for cutting the voting period to one week?
>
I don't know. It would seem to be a case but maybe the hard campaigning in the last week made more of an impact than I would have thought.
Txec dal Már
If you're going to leave a line, make a line!
|
|
|
|
