D. N. Vercáriâ
Group: citizens
(4498 posts total)
(last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercáriâ | > Dieter, by asking a legal opinion of a "Cort Justice" behind everyone's back and before a case has been taken, you have made that Justice officially ineligible to sit on any Cort case that comes out of this proceeding. I can't believe the President of the Republic was so legally irresponsible. Tell us which Justice it was, please.
It is not a matter of asking for legal opinions for a lawsuit, it is a matter of coming to solutions for a nearing problem, real or perceived, that let me talk to a friend who was on AIM. If you are calling this a scandal, enjoy your game. I'm not going to play it with you.
> Honestly, one would think that some people are *trying* to derail the Republic's constitutional processes.
Really, I love your constructive contributions that are founded on the assumption that evil backstabbing conjurors are sneaking around to stir up shit to let the Republic derail whereever and whenever they can. For crying out loud, I see it as my duty to keep the Republic *from* derailing, and therefore I'm trying to fathom if there are solutions and ways out of possible dilemmas. Thank you for your friendly trustfulness.
> Let's put it simply. Someone who acts for the SoS under the SoS's orders while the SoS is not around is NOT THE SOS and is thus under no constitutional prohibitions. Txec, run the election now. Anyone takes a case - in front of the sole Justice who Deet hasn't just disqualified through rank irresponsibility - I will act as your defence lawyer.
Who has been talking about lawsuits? Btw., read my message correctly. Where did I say that the SoS issue has been debated with a Justice?
*groan*, *hmpf*, etc.
__________________
- Dieter
|
