la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ | > Again, I'm amazed how quick you are in spicing up a discussion with the advice to turn it into a Court case.
But... but Deet, if there is a problem with interpretation of the law, then turning it into a Court case is precisely what should happen. The job of the Government is to make things happen, not to try to find reasons why they shouldn't or can't happen. What's wrong with turning it into a Court case?
> Futhermore I'm amazed by the words that you are choosing - talking to fellow Talossans by AIM or ICQ or similar means of communication is "talking behind everyone's back"? You're kidding, aren't you? You must be kidding.
Undermining the independence of the High Court by asking their legal advice on something is an act of vandalism at the very foundations of our Constitution. The Court makes decisions, not gives advice. How the hell can Justice Gruber (for it is obviously he you speak of) make an impartial decision in the lawsuit that is obviously coming up now that he's already given you advice showing that he doesn't have an open mind on this issue?
If you don't understand why that is then it's a damn good thing that you will no longer be official "defender of the Constitution" in two weeks time. If there is no President on June 1, then I will certainly act according to my understanding of the Constitution and carry out the Presidential functions until there is one. You can either go along with this, or take me to Court to try to stop me.
Miestrâ Schivâ
Túischac'h dàl Camerâ dels Deputats
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic
Eminençâ Grischun dels Zefençadéirs dàl Repúblicâ Talossán
|
