Justice dal Navâ
Group: admins
(5222 posts total)
(last post: March 14, 2008 - 13:43)
Citizen #2:
Chris Gruber | > > This is why my notion has always been that at X number of citizens, we constitute the Senate. However, no one has ever shown much interest in this scalable sort of legislative arrangement.
Au contraire, Jeanathon. I have said this seems like the only compromise I can live with. I believe strongly in a bicameral legislature, but I can admit that the current population may not be able to sustain it. I do, however, distrust any adn all attempt to abolish the Senäts in every instance.
What good reason is there to NOT have a Senäts? The only argument against it is low population. And abolition of the Senäts sounds like a permanent solution to a temporary problem.
> We could start out with one chamber, and the day our citizens' roll exceeds 100, we'll discuss the necessary amendment to constitute a Senäts.
Um, how about 35? Even the Kingdom never had 100.
> Dieter, provinces can be used for many more things than just sending a senator to the Senäts.
Sure, but who represents them in Parlamînt?
--------------------------------------
E isc al Arendra del Bún Úr. Fáden es fóclan gleðen fer brach. El Bún Úr fólat ëtfin cún sino synt prepar. Cún þis paset, þa omin isc fólen. Es lyþ was sár. -- vól Cúliðlaþ
Chirischtôval Curt Cavéir,
Dean of the Republic of Talossa
|
