[Citizens Toolbox] [Immigration] |
| No Running elections |
Parent message | ||||
| Justice dal Navâ | January 31, 2005 - 14:00 | |||
| RE: Question: Unicameralism(#1027), posted by President Anglatzarâ, [IP Hidden], January 31, 2005 - 14:40. Viewed 372 times. |
| User Info | Text |
| President Anglatzarâ Group: admins (3194 posts total) (last post: March 14, 2008 - 07:21) Citizen #23: Ián Anglatzarâ | > What good reason is there to NOT have a Senäts? Er, the same reason we don't have a homeowners' society or a military junta? We don't need them. > > We could start out with one chamber, and the day our citizens' roll exceeds 100, we'll discuss the necessary amendment to constitute a Senäts. > > Um, how about 35? Even the Kingdom never had 100. The Kingdom didn't need a senate either, that is correct. > > Dieter, provinces can be used for many more things than just sending a senator to the Senäts. > > Sure, but who represents them in Parlamînt? Who represents the left handed? The teachers? The women? Why do our admittedly rather artificial provinces, of all organisatory groupings, need special representation? --  |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|