[Talossa.com portal]
[Citizens Toolbox]
[Immigration]
No Running elections

Parent message
Justice dal NavâJanuary 31, 2005 - 19:23
RE: Precise results(#1041), posted by D. N. Vercáriâ, [IP Hidden], January 31, 2005 - 19:58. Viewed 321 times.
User InfoText
D. N. Vercáriâ
Group: citizens
(4498 posts total)
(last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercáriâ

> However, putting restrictions on newbies wanting to run for the presidency is completely consistent with democratic ideals. It doesn't say "You can never do this," it just says "You can't do this for a while." Barring re-election of a president past that one chance is a Never Again proposition. And therefore, undemocratic.

Oops. Now I see what you mean. Anyway I understood the amendment like "you can't do this for a while", or more precisely, like "after two consecutive terms it's time to time to stand down for at least one term". If someone proves that indeed this amendment is a "never again" clause, then we should possibly try to amend the amendment.

- D. N. Vercáriâ
RE: Precise resultsD. N. VercáriâJanuary 31, 2005 - 19:58
President AnglatzarâFebruary 01, 2005 - 02:46
Back to the forum | Forums Overview| Activate Thread View
Forums Overview | Login | Register | Lost your password? Cyphor (Release: 0.19, PHP 5.2.5)