|
| Anyone want to second these? | Gödafrďeu Válcadác’h | February 22, 2005 - 11:52 | | D. N. Vercáriâ | February 22, 2005 - 14:45 |
|
Parent message | | Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h | February 22, 2005 - 11:52 |
| RE: Anyone want to second these?(#1130), posted by D. N. Vercáriâ, [IP Hidden], February 22, 2005 - 14:45. Viewed 715 times. |
|
D. N. Vercáriâ
Group: citizens
(4498 posts total)
(last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51)
Citizen #6:
Gödafrďeu Válcadác’h | No-one seconding any further amendments is certainly a vote for the next steps that will lead us away from the wild revolutionary era of our young republic. It's time to move on. ;-)
- D. N. Vercáriâ |
|
| | la garçâ malpadert | February 22, 2005 - 21:07 |
|
Parent message | | D. N. Vercáriâ | February 22, 2005 - 14:45 |
| Sorry to disappoint you, but...(#1132), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], February 22, 2005 - 21:07. Viewed 692 times. |
|
la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #6:
Gödafrďeu Válcadác’h | I second your proposal, Deet. :) We have to vote on the "bicameral with delay" proposal (which has been seconded by Chris and JKK) anyway, so we might as well talk about your one too.
Göd's proposals, on the other hand, are exactly the sort of tinkering with wording which I specifically said I wouldn't allow in this round. However, the Committee will take them under advisement when we tighten up the Final Draft for ratification.
Miestrâ Schivâ
"The Republic's Most Articulate Spokeswhatever" - R. B. Madison
A slave begins by demanding justice, and ends by wanting to wear a crown. |
|
| | Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h | February 23, 2005 - 23:07 |
|
Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | February 22, 2005 - 21:07 |
| RE: Sorry to disappoint you, but...(#1142), posted by Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h, [IP Hidden], February 23, 2005 - 23:07. Viewed 672 times. |
|
Gödafrďeu Válcadác’h
Group: admins
(3164 posts total)
(last post: March 14, 2008 - 15:24)
Citizen #6:
Gödafrďeu Válcadác’h | > Göd's proposals, on the other hand, are exactly the sort of tinkering with wording which I specifically said I wouldn't allow in this round. However, the Committee will take them under advisement when we tighten up the Final Draft for ratification.
Anything I marked as "Amendment"s were items I felt were more than just "tinkering" with words -- representations of substantial issues. However, I have come around in some of those cases.
As for the things marked "typos", I have to agree with Miestra here. Sorry about that.
G. V.
www.icantbelieveitsnottonal.com
The Talossan Wiki at www.talossapedia.com |
|
| | Mr. Furxheir, R.M.W. | February 22, 2005 - 14:15 |
|
Parent message | | Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h | February 22, 2005 - 11:52 |
| Nope...(#1129), posted by Mr. Furxheir, R.M.W., [IP Hidden], February 22, 2005 - 14:15. Viewed 720 times. |
|
Mr. Furxheir, R.M.W.
Group: admins
(1791 posts total)
(last post: November 24, 2007 - 15:07)
Citizen #6:
Gödafrďeu Válcadác’h | In most part, they are minor changes that can be addresses later down the road.
I am opposed to naming our capital after Coop, not that I have something agaisnt him, but I believe that such an honor should be given to a DEAD citizen, and not to a living one.
In Québec, to name a street after a person, that person must have been dead for [if I recall properly] 10 years, unless that person had been Prime-Minister, in which case the delay is 1 year minimum.
What does an elephant with Diarrhea need ?
Lot's of space...
|
|
| | D. N. Vercáriâ | February 22, 2005 - 16:55 |
|
Parent message | | Mr. Furxheir, R.M.W. | February 22, 2005 - 14:15 |
| RE: Tangent(#1131), posted by D. N. Vercáriâ, [IP Hidden], February 22, 2005 - 16:55. Viewed 752 times. |
|
D. N. Vercáriâ
Group: citizens
(4498 posts total)
(last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51)
Citizen #6:
Gödafrďeu Válcadác’h | > In Québec, to name a street after a person, that person must have been dead for [if I recall properly] 10 years, unless that person had been Prime-Minister, in which case the delay is 1 year minimum.
What's that with the Prime Ministers, are Quebecers afraid that the deceased PMs could return (and possibly be re-elected) within this one year?
- D. N. Vercáriâ |
|
| | JKK | February 23, 2005 - 05:50 |
|
Parent message | | D. N. Vercáriâ | February 22, 2005 - 16:55 |
| RE: Tangent(#1134), posted by JKK, [IP Hidden], February 23, 2005 - 05:50. Viewed 693 times. |
|
JKK
Group: citizens
(738 posts total)
(last post: August 11, 2005 - 01:39)
Citizen #6:
Gödafrďeu Válcadác’h | We had an election for US Senator in Missouri in 2000 where one of the two major candidates died not long before Election Day. The corpse won. Naturally, our beloved President-Elect named the loser his Attorney General, just to salve his pain on the Night of the Living Dead.
jkk
AIM: jkkandalex
E-mail: apostate at gte dot net |
|
|
|
