[Citizens Toolbox] [Immigration] |
| No Running elections |
Parent message | ||||
| D. N. Vercáriâ | February 24, 2005 - 04:11 | |||
| RE: Voting on Amendments to Third Draft Constitution OPENS(#1159), posted by President Anglatzarâ, [IP Hidden], February 24, 2005 - 08:29. Viewed 627 times. |
| User Info | Text |
| President Anglatzarā Group: admins (3194 posts total) (last post: March 14, 2008 - 07:21) Citizen #23: Iįn Anglatzarā | > > > > > > Is the this amended text more like what you suggested? > > > > > > Yes, whereas there should have been a 3rd clause which applies if there is no local legislation; in this case the petition would need the consent of the Parlamînt. > > > > I think that's covered by "Parlamint may create a new province, etc". I.e. it doesn't *have* to. > > Ugh. I didn't see this, because I kind of didn't want to see this. It has been my intention to express that the Parliament must not be involved in structuring or restructuring provinces, except if a province doesn't have means to get the neccessary actions done in a legal way. I hope you don't mean to leave the Parlamīnt out altogether. The Parlamīnt is the legislative body of the Republic. Even if we're just talking of rubberstamping, all law-making should pass the House before coming into force. Or else it hasn't happened. --  |
| |||||||||
|