la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ |
> You have recommended having one Justice for the time being.
> I can understand brevity for a small country, but that gives one person the ultimate say on all judicial matters which ways in pretty heavy considering there is nothing to keep this person in check until the government forms. How about 2 for the time being instead.
A good point. The problem is finding two people who were (a) qualified for the job, (b) willing to step aside from all political office for the time being. I think finding *one* of those might be a mish. (Do you have that expression in America? Short for "mission", i.e. a challenging task.)
Nevertheless, if we do have two such citizens, I will be all in favour of a bill in Parlamint to appoint a second Justice. I think we should have as many as are qualified and available, which I think will be pushing it to get to 2 in the early days at least.
Miestrâ Schivâ
"Russia, China, Romania, they can have all the democracy they want, they can have a great big democracy cakewalk right down the middle of Tiananmen Square, and it won't make a lick of difference because we've got the Bomb. All right?"
|
