[Talossa.com portal]
[Citizens Toolbox]
[Immigration]
No Running elections

Parent message
Ep Inxheneu CrovâJune 30, 2007 - 09:44
RE: Regarding 5RC5, the Electoral Reform Bill(#645), posted by President Anglatzarâ, [IP Hidden], June 30, 2007 - 10:25. Viewed 339 times.
User InfoText
President Anglatzarâ
Group: admins
(3194 posts total)
(last post: March 14, 2008 - 07:21)
Citizen #23:
Ián Anglatzarâ
> > > Does the Chamber agree that the following changes can be made and be considered as simple proofreading?
> >
> > I have no objections.
> >
> > > PART TWO:1:a random order according to surname -> random order
> > > (what would random order according to surname mean?)
> >
> > A hangover from an earlier draft where the word was "alphabetical", not "random".
> >
> > > Then a general question. If I read the law right, it is quite possible that an election might lead to not all seats being filled. Unlikely, but by no means impossible. What happens then?
>
> Surely as long as there were five candidates, all seats would be filled-in STV normally the highest ranking candidate(s) left without a quota are deemed elected...?

If there are, say, six candidates, and three of them are not ranked by any voter. You only have to indicate a FIRST preference... I can't see that any of those three would be elected then.
--
I serve.
RE: Regarding 5RC5, the Electoral Reform BillPresident AnglatzarâJune 30, 2007 - 10:25
la garçâ malpadertJune 30, 2007 - 20:30
Reply to this post | Back to the forum | Forums Overview| Activate Thread View
Forums Overview | Login | Register | Lost your password? Cyphor (Release: 0.19, PHP 5.2.5)