[Talossa.com portal]
[Citizens Toolbox]
[Immigration]
No Running elections

Parent message
la garçâ malpadertDecember 04, 2007 - 15:56
RE: in regard to proposal: The Webspace Nationalisation Amendment(#704), posted by Ep Inxheneu Crovâ, [IP Hidden], December 04, 2007 - 16:04. Viewed 341 times.
User InfoText
Ep Inxheneu Crovâ
Group: admins
(1303 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 03:56)
Citizen #34:
Dermot
> In other words: the contracting would be done in the name of a non-profit organisation incorporated under macronational law in an appropriate territory, but whose legal leadership would coincidentally be the leadership of the Talossan Republic. I assume the actual technical work of contracting would be done by the Minister of Technology, as is mandated in current legislation.
>

This could potentially cost hundreds of dollars, and I know because I spent quite a bit of time looking into it. If we had a proper tax on every citizen, we could reasonably hope to cover both the establishment costs and the ongoing administration involved, let alone the cost. Or someone could pay for it out of his/her own , but then we're back to solo runs.

Why exactly is it a problem to just say we are the Republic of Talossa, unincorporated non-profit assocition like your average social club or residents association, and keep individual names out of it? Under the law od Wisconsin that would put us under limited liability and allow us to own real property.

We seem to be going in circles on this. We have the money and the laws to get this done, however we want. Lets not reinvent the wheel on it.

D
================================

De l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace et la patrie sera sauvée
Georges Danton
Reply to this post | Back to the forum | Forums Overview| Activate Thread View
Forums Overview | Login | Register | Lost your password? Cyphor (Release: 0.19, PHP 5.2.5)