D. N. Vercáriâ
Group: citizens
(4498 posts total)
(last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercáriâ | > > > > i am still puzzled. the only sentence, which may be understood in a way you did, is "after discussion with deet, we agreed on founding of "talossan telecom" (TT),..." but it implies no definitive decision or partisan act, it just says plainly, the the we agreed/concur/coalesce on some idea we proposed to discussion... i read in it nothing more.
> > > >
> > > > does the verb "to agree" mean or imply verb "to decide"?
> > >
> > > "We agreed on founding" does actually mean that you have decided to found it, yes.
> >
> > So *if* we had founded some whatever, what would have been the problem?
>
> If half the government had made a decision how to host our domains without telling the other half before they decided it all on their own, that would have been a problem, yes. I'd say it would have collapsed the government pretty efficiently.
*cough* But if John Tyrannosaurus Smith and Samantha Tyrannosaura Jones would choose to host something that they'd love to call "New Talossan Fora" at a place of their choice, who of our citizens had to follow them? I guess we who are not Smith and Jones already agreed on having a plebiscite to sort these things out.
More precisely to the point, Mr President, if I and anyone else would love to found a Talossan Art School, would this foundation have to be acknowledged by the government? If the government wouldn' like said foundation, they hopefully rather shrug and mind their government business instead of feeling tickled into causing a pretty efficient collapse.
_________________
- Dieter
A long history is fine, a long future is better.
|
