|
| RE: More Explanation Please! | la garçâ malpadert | January 15, 2008 - 15:23 | | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 15, 2008 - 15:47 |
|
Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 15, 2008 - 15:23 |
| RE: More Explanation Please!(#754), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 15, 2008 - 15:47. Viewed 436 times. |
|
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu
Group: citizens
(847 posts total)
(last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ | I just looked at the example that you linked to....
Interesting. Perhaps this can be a function of portion of the Secretary of State's office?
I could put something like this together for us. I could try to make it regular?
|
|
| | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 15, 2008 - 15:34 |
|
Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 15, 2008 - 15:23 |
| RE: More Explanation Please!(#751), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 15, 2008 - 15:34. Viewed 429 times. |
|
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu
Group: citizens
(847 posts total)
(last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ | So, if I am understanding this correctly...
The CoD would have a set day of the week, say Monday, in which the Túischac’h (or whoever) would publish the list of Proposals that are ready for Final Vote or even new Proposals that are ready for amendment phase?
These would all be published into one collective forum post and then the Deputies would vote on them as a package deal? I am fervently against package deal legislation which is one of the failing of the US government, IMHO.
Or vote on them individually? I am not sure how that would be different than what we are doing now, beyond just having the addition of a summary document?
I apologize to those who are familiar with this. =(
I am thinking that I do not completely understand.
|
|
| | la garçâ malpadert | January 15, 2008 - 15:39 |
|
Parent message | | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 15, 2008 - 15:34 |
| RE: More Explanation Please!(#752), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], January 15, 2008 - 15:39. Viewed 465 times. |
|
la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ |
> The CoD would have a set day of the week, say Monday, in which the Túischac’h (or whoever) would publish the list of Proposals that are ready for Final Vote or even new Proposals that are ready for amendment phase?
Uh-huh.
> These would all be published into one collective forum post
...or styly-looking PDF document.
> and then the Deputies would vote on them as a package deal?
No, each individual proposal in the journal would be voted on separately.
> I am not sure how that would be different than what we are doing now, beyond just having the addition of a summary document?
The main difference is that the voting period would be identical for all the bills in any one journal. We wouldn't have the confusing situation we have at the moment where one bill might begin its voting period two days and eighteen hours into the voting period of a separate bill. Plus, we would have a formal record.
Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Immigration
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Founder-President, ZRT - Party of National Unity
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic
TALOSSA, C’È ASÚNTS SERIÖSEN!
|
|
| | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 15, 2008 - 15:45 |
|
Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 15, 2008 - 15:39 |
| RE: More Explanation Please!(#753), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 15, 2008 - 15:45. Viewed 483 times. |
|
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu
Group: citizens
(847 posts total)
(last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ | Interesting...
That would aleviate some of the confusion, but would be a bit more work for all involved.
It would also create much more for the Chamber to consider at one time; instead of being able to stagger our thoughts on the legislation as it comes we would have to focus it all at one time.
Hmmmm....
Perhaps this could be as a joint effort from the SoS' office and the Túischac’h?
All this would take would be an amendment to the Standing Orders, right?
Hmmm.. I can get a template put together if you like?. Perhaps by Friday'ish?
|
|
| | la garçâ malpadert | January 15, 2008 - 16:16 |
|
Parent message | | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 15, 2008 - 15:45 |
| RE: More Explanation Please!(#755), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], January 15, 2008 - 16:16. Viewed 452 times. |
|
la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ |
> Perhaps this could be as a joint effort from the SoS' office and the Túischac’h?
Perhaps the new SoS and the Tuischac'h should discuss this once the SoS is decided. ;-)
> All this would take would be an amendment to the Standing Orders, right?
Yes.
> Hmmm.. I can get a template put together if you like?. Perhaps by Friday'ish?
Oh, no rush - if you're keen you can do it now, but it's of no urgency, I feel.
Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Immigration
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Founder-President, ZRT - Party of National Unity
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic
TALOSSA, C’È ASÚNTS SERIÖSEN!
|
|
|
|
