D. N. Vercáriâ
Group: citizens
(4498 posts total)
(last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51)
Citizen #26:
Dieter N Vercáriâ | S:reu Túischac'h, esteemed fellow Deputies, more or less I agree to the proposed statement on the topic of Talossan unity. Let's call it the Schivâ Doctrine whenever we'll refer to it in the future.
Two minor concerns:
Let's not make this document a law, because
a) it would impose an unfair restriction on politicians, groups and parties which like to pursue a different way in intertalossan affairs. It shall remain fully up to the wisdom of the electors whether they would support a different approach or not. Freedom of speech and thought must not be limited by a law, even if eternal repetitions of the same arguments that are going around in circles will supposedly make us sick and tired.
b) I'm not completely sure about this, but I reckon if the document became a law, it might introduce a new definition of Talossan nationality to our laws, which possibly exceeds the term and definition of citizenship that we are using by now. This extended definition might eventually implicitly trump Const. I,2.3.
But I wouldn't object to passing the document as is as a motion of the Chamber of Deputies.
_________________
- Dieter
A long history is fine, a long future is better.
|
