la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ |
> My preference is to pass it as a resolution and not as legistation. I do not think we should have to change a law because we have changed our stance on Public Relations with the Kingdom. Laws are for determining processes and outcomes, and not specifying attitudes or stances. Resolutions are for that.
On the contrary, estimat Tuischac'h, laws are for determining what a government is allowed and not allowed to do. This bill does precisely that - it specifically makes no imposition on the rights of any private citizen. Making it a resolution will make it worthless, since any government will be free to ignore it.
Your amendment, BTW, should make it clear that you are suggesting changing 6RC5 from a bill to enact legislation to a resolution with no legislative force. And it makes absolutely no sense that a resolution of this chamber should have Presidential assent - that's only to enact laws. I also don't see the sense in having a referendum on a non-binding resolution that everyone's free to ignore.
What do others think?
Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Immigration
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Founder-President, ZRT - Party of National Unity
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic
TALOSSA, C’È ASÚNTS SERIÖSEN!
|
