|
| Reformation Ideas? | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 15, 2008 - 14:53 | | la garçâ malpadert | January 15, 2008 - 15:15 |
|
Parent message | | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 15, 2008 - 14:53 |
| RE: Reformation Ideas?(#1911), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], January 15, 2008 - 15:15. Viewed 188 times. |
|
la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #33:
James O'Neill |
> What are your thoughts on a more encompassing approach to provincial reform? I might be able to be persuaded by other more comprehensive reform ideas that you may have with this as a stepping stone.
Estimat Tuischac'h, I believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix it. The simple idea is that provinces are supposed to be a secondary, less serious, more playful and more direct-democracy version of federal politics. In that sense, Cezembre and Florencia provinces are working fine, and in the spirit which was intended. Maricopa's a bit relaxed right now, but that's because Governor Jim is on holiday. But PMX only has two citizens, and Maritiimi has none - they have never worked, not since the Revolution.
The question is whether you agree with my idea of what provinces are for - then we can decide how many there should be and how their citizenry should be determined.
Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Immigration
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Founder-President, ZRT - Party of National Unity
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic
TALOSSA, C’È ASÚNTS SERIÖSEN!
|
|
|
|
