|
| Dead | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 21, 2008 - 17:32 | | la garçâ malpadert | January 21, 2008 - 19:41 |
|
Parent message | | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 21, 2008 - 17:32 |
| What the...?(#1923), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], January 21, 2008 - 19:41. Viewed 156 times. |
|
la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #33:
James O'Neill | > The proposed amendments were not satisfied within the 7 day period.
Estimat Túischac'h, what does this mean? What does it mean for an amendment to be "satisfied"?
No-one seems to have actually submitted any actual amendments. Therefore, surely the bill should go to Final Vote as planned.
Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Immigration
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Founder-President, ZRT - Party of National Unity
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic
TALOSSA, C’È ASÚNTS SERIÖSEN!
|
|
| | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 22, 2008 - 09:13 |
|
Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 21, 2008 - 19:41 |
| RE: What the...?(#1929), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 22, 2008 - 09:13. Viewed 135 times. |
|
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu
Group: citizens
(847 posts total)
(last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13)
Citizen #33:
James O'Neill | Right, there is not Dead in Water status, but I had to call it something.
I formally proposed an amendement and nothing was done to satisfiy it.
The Standing Orders are not specific as to what should be done in te case that an Amendment cannot be satisfied.
I am more than happy to extend the Proposal Phase to make sure that this gets resolved and the Proposal moves on.
|
|
|
|
