|
| There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" status | la garçâ malpadert | January 21, 2008 - 19:47 | | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 22, 2008 - 09:12 |
| Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 21, 2008 - 19:47 |
| RE: There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" status(#1928), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 22, 2008 - 09:12. Viewed 283 times. |
|
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu Group: citizens (847 posts total) (last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13) Citizen #22: Miestrâ Schivâ | Right, there is not Dead in Water status, but I had to call it something.
I formally proposed an amendement and nothing was done to satisfiy it.
The Standing Orders are not specific as to what should be done in te case that an Amendment cannot be satisfied.
I am more than happy to extend the Proposal Phase to make sure that this gets resolved and the Proposal moves on.
|
|
| | la garçâ malpadert | January 22, 2008 - 15:27 |
| Parent message | | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 22, 2008 - 09:12 |
| RE: There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" status(#1930), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], January 22, 2008 - 15:27. Viewed 295 times. |
|
la garçâ malpadert Group: admins (4379 posts total) (last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29) Citizen #22: Miestrâ Schivâ | > Right, there is not Dead in Water status, but I had to call it something.
> I formally proposed an amendement and nothing was done to satisfiy it.
What do you mean, "satisfy it"? The phrase "satisfy an amendment" doesn't make any sense. You proposed an amendment: if you want that amendment to stand, we should vote on the amendment now, as explained in Standing Orders 3. And then when the amendment has been accepted or rejected by majority vote, we have a Final Vote on the bill either including the amendment or not, as the case may be.
Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Immigration
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Founder-President, ZRT - Party of National Unity
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic
TALOSSA, C’È ASÚNTS SERIÖSEN!
|
|
| | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 23, 2008 - 09:26 |
| Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 22, 2008 - 15:27 |
| Thank for the adjustment! =)(#1940), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 23, 2008 - 09:26. Viewed 295 times. |
|
| | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 22, 2008 - 15:34 |
| Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 22, 2008 - 15:27 |
| RE: There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" status(#1931), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 22, 2008 - 15:34. Viewed 290 times. |
|
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu Group: citizens (847 posts total) (last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13) Citizen #22: Miestrâ Schivâ | Hmmm... wow... that little nugget is nestled right in there.
Seven days after publication of the draft, voting on the amendments shall begin, and last for seven days.
OK, so Amendments are proposed during the 7 day Amendment cycle and then we vote on all amendments that are proposed?
|
|
| | la garçâ malpadert | January 22, 2008 - 16:28 |
| Parent message | | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 22, 2008 - 15:34 |
| RE: There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" status(#1932), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], January 22, 2008 - 16:28. Viewed 326 times. |
|
la garçâ malpadert Group: admins (4379 posts total) (last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29) Citizen #22: Miestrâ Schivâ |
> OK, so Amendments are proposed during the 7 day Amendment cycle and then we vote on all amendments that are proposed?
Precisely. And after that comes the Final Vote on the bill as amended, or not as the case may be.
To show my good will, here is an amendment that would change this from a bill to a Resolution - not that I support it, but this will give effect to what you and Dieter were talking about, and I am happy for it to go to a vote and will abide by the final result.
AMENDMENT:
1. That the preamble to this Bill be changed to:
The Chamber of Deputies resolves that the following principles should form the basis of all policy by the Government of this Republic towards the Talossan Royalist regime:
2. That section 8 of this bill be deleted.
Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Immigration
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Founder-President, ZRT - Party of National Unity
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic
TALOSSA, C’È ASÚNTS SERIÖSEN!
|
|
| | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 23, 2008 - 09:13 |
| Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 22, 2008 - 16:28 |
| Satisfied (n/t)(#1935), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 23, 2008 - 09:13. Viewed 289 times. |
|
| | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 23, 2008 - 09:09 |
| Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 22, 2008 - 16:28 |
| Vote to come.(#1934), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 23, 2008 - 09:09. Viewed 283 times. |
|
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu Group: citizens (847 posts total) (last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13) Citizen #22: Miestrâ Schivâ | Rock'n!
When I was rewriting the Standing Orders and came up with this possiblity where the Amendements could not be satisfied, I decided on trying a vote as it currently is in the Standing Orders. The only thing I do not like about it is that if a single party has control of the Chamber there is nothing that any one can do. I do not like 2 party states for this reason.
Alrighty then. I will get this thing up voted on.
|
|
| | D. N. Vercáriâ | January 23, 2008 - 04:42 |
| Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 22, 2008 - 16:28 |
| RE: There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" status(#1933), posted by D. N. Vercáriâ, [IP Hidden], January 23, 2008 - 04:42. Viewed 271 times. |
|
D. N. Vercáriâ Group: citizens (4498 posts total) (last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51) Citizen #22: Miestrâ Schivâ | >
> > OK, so Amendments are proposed during the 7 day Amendment cycle and then we vote on all amendments that are proposed?
>
> Precisely. And after that comes the Final Vote on the bill as amended, or not as the case may be.
>
> To show my good will, here is an amendment that would change this from a bill to a Resolution - not that I support it, but this will give effect to what you and Dieter were talking about, and I am happy for it to go to a vote and will abide by the final result.
>
> AMENDMENT:
>
> 1. That the preamble to this Bill be changed to:
>
> The Chamber of Deputies resolves that the following principles should form the basis of all policy by the Government of this Republic towards the Talossan Royalist regime:
>
> 2. That section 8 of this bill be deleted.
I could live with it.
_________________
- Dieter
A long history is fine, a long future is better.
|
|
|
|