[Talossa.com portal]
[Citizens Toolbox]
[Immigration]
[Propose a bill or an ammendment]
[Vote on bills or ammendments]
Parent message
Túischac’h Txec EreufighleuJanuary 22, 2008 - 09:12
RE: There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" status(#1930), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], January 22, 2008 - 15:27. Viewed 296 times.
User InfoText
la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ		> Right, there is not Dead in Water status, but I had to call it something.
> I formally proposed an amendement and nothing was done to satisfiy it.

What do you mean, "satisfy it"? The phrase "satisfy an amendment" doesn't make any sense. You proposed an amendment: if you want that amendment to stand, we should vote on the amendment now, as explained in Standing Orders 3. And then when the amendment has been accepted or rejected by majority vote, we have a Final Vote on the bill either including the amendment or not, as the case may be.





Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Immigration
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Founder-President, ZRT - Party of National Unity
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic

TALOSSA, C’È ASÚNTS SERIÖSEN!
RE: There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" statusla garçâ malpadertJanuary 22, 2008 - 15:27
Túischac’h Txec EreufighleuJanuary 23, 2008 - 09:26
Parent message
la garçâ malpadertJanuary 22, 2008 - 15:27
Thank for the adjustment! =)(#1940), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 23, 2008 - 09:26. Viewed 295 times.
User InfoText
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu
Group: citizens
(847 posts total)
(last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ		=)

Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu
Resident Pot Stirrer
A one man stampede towards an opportunity to be chivalrous. MJBIII
Chairman of the Union for Talossan Progress

Túischac’h Txec EreufighleuJanuary 22, 2008 - 15:34
Parent message
la garçâ malpadertJanuary 22, 2008 - 15:27
RE: There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" status(#1931), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 22, 2008 - 15:34. Viewed 290 times.
User InfoText
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu
Group: citizens
(847 posts total)
(last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ		Hmmm... wow... that little nugget is nestled right in there.

Seven days after publication of the draft, voting on the amendments shall begin, and last for seven days.


OK, so Amendments are proposed during the 7 day Amendment cycle and then we vote on all amendments that are proposed?


Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu
Resident Pot Stirrer
A one man stampede towards an opportunity to be chivalrous. MJBIII
Chairman of the Union for Talossan Progress

la garçâ malpadertJanuary 22, 2008 - 16:28
Parent message
Túischac’h Txec EreufighleuJanuary 22, 2008 - 15:34
RE: There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" status(#1932), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], January 22, 2008 - 16:28. Viewed 326 times.
User InfoText
la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ
> OK, so Amendments are proposed during the 7 day Amendment cycle and then we vote on all amendments that are proposed?

Precisely. And after that comes the Final Vote on the bill as amended, or not as the case may be.

To show my good will, here is an amendment that would change this from a bill to a Resolution - not that I support it, but this will give effect to what you and Dieter were talking about, and I am happy for it to go to a vote and will abide by the final result.

AMENDMENT:

1. That the preamble to this Bill be changed to:

The Chamber of Deputies resolves that the following principles should form the basis of all policy by the Government of this Republic towards the Talossan Royalist regime:

2. That section 8 of this bill be deleted.







Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Immigration
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Founder-President, ZRT - Party of National Unity
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic

TALOSSA, C’È ASÚNTS SERIÖSEN!
Túischac’h Txec EreufighleuJanuary 23, 2008 - 09:13
Parent message
la garçâ malpadertJanuary 22, 2008 - 16:28
Satisfied (n/t)(#1935), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 23, 2008 - 09:13. Viewed 289 times.
User InfoText
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu
Group: citizens
(847 posts total)
(last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ		(n/t)

Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu
Resident Pot Stirrer
A one man stampede towards an opportunity to be chivalrous. MJBIII
Chairman of the Union for Talossan Progress

Túischac’h Txec EreufighleuJanuary 23, 2008 - 09:09
Parent message
la garçâ malpadertJanuary 22, 2008 - 16:28
Vote to come.(#1934), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 23, 2008 - 09:09. Viewed 283 times.
User InfoText
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu
Group: citizens
(847 posts total)
(last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ		Rock'n!

When I was rewriting the Standing Orders and came up with this possiblity where the Amendements could not be satisfied, I decided on trying a vote as it currently is in the Standing Orders. The only thing I do not like about it is that if a single party has control of the Chamber there is nothing that any one can do. I do not like 2 party states for this reason.

Alrighty then. I will get this thing up voted on.

Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu
Resident Pot Stirrer
A one man stampede towards an opportunity to be chivalrous. MJBIII
Chairman of the Union for Talossan Progress

D. N. VercáriâJanuary 23, 2008 - 04:42
Parent message
la garçâ malpadertJanuary 22, 2008 - 16:28
RE: There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" status(#1933), posted by D. N. Vercáriâ, [IP Hidden], January 23, 2008 - 04:42. Viewed 271 times.
User InfoText
D. N. Vercáriâ
Group: citizens
(4498 posts total)
(last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ		>
> > OK, so Amendments are proposed during the 7 day Amendment cycle and then we vote on all amendments that are proposed?
>
> Precisely. And after that comes the Final Vote on the bill as amended, or not as the case may be.
>
> To show my good will, here is an amendment that would change this from a bill to a Resolution - not that I support it, but this will give effect to what you and Dieter were talking about, and I am happy for it to go to a vote and will abide by the final result.
>
>
AMENDMENT:
>
> 1. That the preamble to this Bill be changed to:
>
> The Chamber of Deputies resolves that the following principles should form the basis of all policy by the Government of this Republic towards the Talossan Royalist regime:
>
> 2. That section 8 of this bill be deleted.


I could live with it.

_________________
- Dieter

A long history is fine, a long future is better.

Reply to this post | Back to the forum | Forums Overview| Deactivate Thread View
Forums Overview | Login | Register | Lost your password? Cyphor (Release: 0.19, PHP 5.2.5)