|
| RE: There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" status | la garçâ malpadert | January 22, 2008 - 16:28 | | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 23, 2008 - 09:13 |
| Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 22, 2008 - 16:28 |
| Satisfied (n/t)(#1935), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 23, 2008 - 09:13. Viewed 317 times. |
|
| | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 23, 2008 - 09:09 |
| Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 22, 2008 - 16:28 |
| Vote to come.(#1934), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], January 23, 2008 - 09:09. Viewed 306 times. |
|
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu Group: citizens (847 posts total) (last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13) Citizen #22: Miestrâ Schivâ | Rock'n!
When I was rewriting the Standing Orders and came up with this possiblity where the Amendements could not be satisfied, I decided on trying a vote as it currently is in the Standing Orders. The only thing I do not like about it is that if a single party has control of the Chamber there is nothing that any one can do. I do not like 2 party states for this reason.
Alrighty then. I will get this thing up voted on.
|
|
| | D. N. Vercáriâ | January 23, 2008 - 04:42 |
| Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 22, 2008 - 16:28 |
| RE: There is no such thing as "Dead in the Water" status(#1933), posted by D. N. Vercáriâ, [IP Hidden], January 23, 2008 - 04:42. Viewed 297 times. |
|
D. N. Vercáriâ Group: citizens (4498 posts total) (last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51) Citizen #22: Miestrâ Schivâ | >
> > OK, so Amendments are proposed during the 7 day Amendment cycle and then we vote on all amendments that are proposed?
>
> Precisely. And after that comes the Final Vote on the bill as amended, or not as the case may be.
>
> To show my good will, here is an amendment that would change this from a bill to a Resolution - not that I support it, but this will give effect to what you and Dieter were talking about, and I am happy for it to go to a vote and will abide by the final result.
>
> AMENDMENT:
>
> 1. That the preamble to this Bill be changed to:
>
> The Chamber of Deputies resolves that the following principles should form the basis of all policy by the Government of this Republic towards the Talossan Royalist regime:
>
> 2. That section 8 of this bill be deleted.
I could live with it.
_________________
- Dieter
A long history is fine, a long future is better.
|
|
|
|