|
| [Amendment Vote] 6RC5 The Schivâ Doctrine on Pan-Talossan Affairs Act | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 29, 2008 - 09:03 | | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | February 01, 2008 - 07:37 |
| Parent message | | [Amendment Vote] 6RC5 The Schivâ Doctrine on Pan-Talossan Affairs Act | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 29, 2008 - 09:03 |
| Not Passed (w/c)(#1963), posted by Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu, [IP Hidden], February 01, 2008 - 07:37. Viewed 281 times. |
|
Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu Group: citizens (847 posts total) (last post: March 12, 2008 - 12:13) Citizen #33: James O'Neill | I also like that it is passed by referendum - I recommended it as well, but for some reason that I cannot accurately articulate I do not like that it will have force of law.
|
|
| | Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h | February 01, 2008 - 00:58 |
| Parent message | | [Amendment Vote] 6RC5 The Schivâ Doctrine on Pan-Talossan Affairs Act | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 29, 2008 - 09:03 |
| Contrâ(#1961), posted by Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h, [IP Hidden], February 01, 2008 - 00:58. Viewed 259 times. |
|
Gödafrïeu Válcadác’h Group: admins (3164 posts total) (last post: March 14, 2008 - 15:24) Citizen #33: James O'Neill | Esteemed, Speaker, if Miestrâ doesn't like her own amendment, then neither do I. We all have issued the klunker Prime Dictate and amendment in our lives. No big deal.
My take on the Schivâ Doctrine is forthcoming. And as she says, there is the clause specifying a referendum on the subject. I, for one, would love to see a nationwide vote on this matter containing hard and tough text not watered down.
I have at least one issue with the Schivâ doctrine, but have no issues with it going to the people for a referendum. I agree with her: let the people decide directly. It's their country, too, and their country that's at stake here.
GV, Cin., PlN, PCP, ACDC, HP, HOGWARTS, NFL, CBS, Aug. Nat. Golf, Yale Glee Club, Alcatraz Glee Club, Manchester United Glee Club
Visit oracla.com
You know you want to.
Username: readoracla
Password: andbehappy |
|
| | Ep Inxheneu Crovâ | January 31, 2008 - 01:38 |
| | D. N. Vercáriâ | January 29, 2008 - 15:52 |
| | la garçâ malpadert | January 29, 2008 - 14:58 |
| Parent message | | [Amendment Vote] 6RC5 The Schivâ Doctrine on Pan-Talossan Affairs Act | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 29, 2008 - 09:03 |
| Contrâ(#1956), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], January 29, 2008 - 14:58. Viewed 286 times. |
|
la garçâ malpadert Group: admins (4379 posts total) (last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29) Citizen #33: James O'Neill | If this amendment goes through the Doctrine will be a useless piece of verbiage. Only if it's set in cast iron under what circumstances the question of Talossan unification can be opened does this resolution make any sense.
Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Immigration
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Founder-President, ZRT - Party of National Unity
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic
TALOSSA, C’È ASÚNTS SERIÖSEN!
|
|
| | la garçâ malpadert | January 30, 2008 - 16:10 |
| Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 29, 2008 - 14:58 |
| I should also point out...(#1958), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], January 30, 2008 - 16:10. Viewed 298 times. |
|
la garçâ malpadert Group: admins (4379 posts total) (last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29) Citizen #33: James O'Neill | ... that the unamended version of this bill contains provision for a referendum before it passes into law. Dps. Ereufiglheu and Vercáriâ have genuine reasons for not wanting it to be law, but shouldn't we let the people decide?
Miestrâ Schivâ
Minister of Immigration
Editor, Qator Itrìns
Founder-President, ZRT - Party of National Unity
Chief High Language Geek of the Talossan Republic
TALOSSA, C’È ASÚNTS SERIÖSEN!
|
|
| | D. N. Vercáriâ | January 30, 2008 - 17:04 |
| Parent message | | la garçâ malpadert | January 30, 2008 - 16:10 |
| RE: I should also point out...(#1959), posted by D. N. Vercáriâ, [IP Hidden], January 30, 2008 - 17:04. Viewed 263 times. |
|
D. N. Vercáriâ Group: citizens (4498 posts total) (last post: March 15, 2008 - 16:51) Citizen #33: James O'Neill | > ... that the unamended version of this bill contains provision for a referendum before it passes into law. Dps. Ereufiglheu and Vercáriâ have genuine reasons for not wanting it to be law, but shouldn't we let the people decide?
Well, I prefer to let the people decide in every single election - if there suddenly would be a rush for the BW and their planks, so be it. IMHO, we don't have to erect legalese barbed-wire fences around doctrines, ideologies, ideas. Let's keep our democracy and our discussions open for as many possible changes as possible.
_________________
- Dieter
A long history is fine, a long future is better.
|
|
| | Túischac’h Txec Ereufighleu | January 29, 2008 - 09:04 |
|
|