[Talossa.com portal]
[Citizens Toolbox]
[Immigration]
No Running elections

Parent message
Mr. Furxheir, R.M.W.June 09, 2005 - 07:40
The way I see it(#10), posted by la garçâ malpadert, [IP Hidden], June 09, 2005 - 19:08. Viewed 363 times.
User InfoText
la garçâ malpadert
Group: admins
(4379 posts total)
(last post: March 13, 2008 - 16:29)
Citizen #22:
Miestrâ Schivâ
Let's look at the effective text of RC1:

The Chamber of Deputies resolves to :

1. Permit and encourage the Database Administrator of Talossa to merge the Database System into the Wittenberg Database,
2. Allow Wittenberg and the Database system to share a common login,
3. Enable the Database to be have it's own computerized, automated account to generate Wittenberg posts, such as election notices, new bills notices, election results, etc...
4. Allow the Speaker of the Chamber to delegate to the Database administrator of Talossa some of the Speaker's functions such as the publication of bills or the management of the deputies votes, but not the Speaker's responsablities over such function.


Wittenberg and the Database System are M-P's private property.

There is no law of the Republic telling M-P what to do with this property, except for the section in the Immigration Law declaring that he must give Witt access to prospectives and Friends.

RC1 does not change the above provisions of the Immigration Code.

Therefore, it makes no positive changes to the existing law of the Republic, and therefore does not require the President's assent.

Further, RC1 does not require M-P to do anything new. Sections 1-3 only "encourage" M-P to do certain things that he was going to do anyway. They only offer the approval of the CoD for this move. Sections 1-3 neither prevent or require M-P doing anything. Therefore, they are not a new law and do not need the President's assent.

Section 4 allows the Túischac'h to delegate certain to the Database Administrator. This is an internal matter for the Chamber of Deputies, which controls what the Túischac'h does. Therefore, s.4 are not a new law and do not need the President's assent.

Therefore, none of the above sections create new law. Therefore, none of them require the President's approval. Therefore, RC1 was submitted to the President in error and we should forget any of this ever happened.

If M-P wants the approval of the Government, he should have damn well asked me directly as Seneschál. If he likes, I will ask the President and Cabinet (in private) for their approval of RC1, and announce our decision on the Mitchell later.

If anyone disagrees with my reasoning or the course of action associated with it, speak RIGHT NOW.



Miestrâ Schivâ
Seneschál dal Repúblicâ Talossán / Prime Minister of the Republic of Talossa
"The Republic's Most Articulate Spokeswhatever" - R. B. Madison

Every bloody emperor claims that freedom is his cause
And he buffs up on his common touch as a get-out clause.
Reply to this post | Back to the forum | Forums Overview| Deactivate Thread View
Forums Overview | Login | Register | Lost your password? Cyphor (Release: 0.19, PHP 5.2.5)